HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem ac6 3576
Description: Equivalent of Axiom of Choice. This is useful for proving that there exists, for example, a sequence mapping natural numbers to members of a large set B, where ph depends on x (the natural number) and y (to specify a member of B). A stronger version of this theorem, ac6s 3577, allows B to be a proper class.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ac6.1 |- A e. V
ac6.2 |- B e. V
ac6.3 |- (y = (f` x) -> (ph <-> ps))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ac6 |- (A.x e. A E.y e. B ph -> E.f(f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A ps))
Distinct variable group(s):   x,f,y,A   B,f,x,y   ph,f   ps,y

Proof of Theorem ac6
StepHypRef Expression
1 ac6.1 . . 3 |- A e. V
2 ac6.2 . . 3 |- B e. V
3 cleqid 1102 . . 3 |- {y e. B | ph} = {y e. B | ph}
4 cleq1 1107 . . . . 5 |- (w = z -> (w = {y e. B | ph} <-> z = {y e. B | ph}))
54anbi2d 468 . . . 4 |- (w = z -> ((x e. A /\ w = {y e. B | ph}) <-> (x e. A /\ z = {y e. B | ph})))
65cbvopab2v 2109 . . 3 |- {<.x, w>. | (x e. A /\ w = {y e. B | ph})} = {<.x, z>. | (x e. A /\ z = {y e. B | ph})}
71, 2, 3, 6ac6lem 3575 . 2 |- (A.x e. A E.y e. B ph -> E.f(f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A (f` x) e. {y e. B | ph}))
8 ac6.3 . . . . . . 7 |- (y = (f` x) -> (ph <-> ps))
98elrab 1422 . . . . . 6 |- ((f` x) e. {y e. B | ph} <-> ((f` x) e. B /\ ps))
109pm3.27bd 263 . . . . 5 |- ((f` x) e. {y e. B | ph} -> ps)
1110r19.20si 1254 . . . 4 |- (A.x e. A (f` x) e. {y e. B | ph} -> A.x e. A ps)
1211anim2i 270 . . 3 |- ((f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A (f` x) e. {y e. B | ph}) -> (f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A ps))
131219.22i 723 . 2 |- (E.f(f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A (f` x) e. {y e. B | ph}) -> E.f(f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A ps))
147, 13syl 12 1 |- (A.x e. A E.y e. B ph -> E.f(f:A-->B /\ A.x e. A ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196  E.wex 678   = weq 797   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  A.wral 1201  E.wrex 1202  {crab 1204  Vcvv 1348  {copab 2055  -->wf 2418  ` cfv 2422
This theorem is referenced by:  ac6s 3577  projlem17 5209  osumlem5 5534
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077  ax-reg 1078  ax-ac 1080
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-reu 1207  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-fr 2169  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-f 2434  df-fv 2438
metamath.org