HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem alephnbtwn2 3675
Description: No set has equinumerosity between an aleph and its successor aleph.
Assertion
Ref Expression
alephnbtwn2 |- -. ((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A))

Proof of Theorem alephnbtwn2
StepHypRef Expression
1 cardcard 3655 . . . 4 |- (card` (card` B)) = (card` B)
2 alephnbtwn 3674 . . . 4 |- ((card` (card` B)) = (card` B) -> -. ((aleph` A) e. (card` B) /\ (card` B) e. (aleph` suc A)))
31, 2ax-mp 6 . . 3 |- -. ((aleph` A) e. (card` B) /\ (card` B) e. (aleph` suc A))
4 alephon 3671 . . . . . 6 |- (aleph` A) e. On
5 cardsdomel 3658 . . . . . 6 |- ((aleph` A) e. On -> ((aleph` A) ~< B <-> (aleph` A) e. (card` B)))
64, 5ax-mp 6 . . . . 5 |- ((aleph` A) ~< B <-> (aleph` A) e. (card` B))
76a1i 7 . . . 4 |- (B e. V -> ((aleph` A) ~< B <-> (aleph` A) e. (card` B)))
8 alephon 3671 . . . . . 6 |- (aleph` suc A) e. On
9 cardsdom 3643 . . . . . 6 |- ((B e. V /\ (aleph` suc A) e. On) -> ((card` B) e. (card` (aleph` suc A)) <-> B ~< (aleph` suc A)))
108, 9mpan2 519 . . . . 5 |- (B e. V -> ((card` B) e. (card` (aleph` suc A)) <-> B ~< (aleph` suc A)))
11 alephcard 3673 . . . . . 6 |- (card` (aleph` suc A)) = (aleph` suc A)
1211eleq2i 1153 . . . . 5 |- ((card` B) e. (card` (aleph` suc A)) <-> (card` B) e. (aleph` suc A))
1310, 12syl5rbbr 413 . . . 4 |- (B e. V -> (B ~< (aleph` suc A) <-> (card` B) e. (aleph` suc A)))
147, 13anbi12d 476 . . 3 |- (B e. V -> (((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A)) <-> ((aleph` A) e. (card` B) /\ (card` B) e. (aleph` suc A))))
153, 14mtbiri 539 . 2 |- (B e. V -> -. ((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A)))
16 relsdom 3279 . . . . 5 |- Rel ~<
1716brrelexi 2447 . . . 4 |- (B ~< (aleph` suc A) -> B e. V)
1817adantl 305 . . 3 |- (((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A)) -> B e. V)
1918con3i 90 . 2 |- (-. B e. V -> -. ((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A)))
2015, 19pm2.61i 110 1 |- -. ((aleph` A) ~< B /\ B ~< (aleph` suc A))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 1   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  Vcvv 1348   class class class wbr 2054  Oncon0 2199  suc csuc 2201  ` cfv 2422   ~< csdm 3273  cardccrd 3620  alephcale 3621
This theorem is referenced by:  aleph1 3676  alephsucdom 3685
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077  ax-reg 1078  ax-inf 1079  ax-ac 1080
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ne 1192  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-reu 1207  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-sbc 1441  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-pss 1494  df-nul 1708  df-if 1777  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-int 1966  df-iun 1996  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-lim 2204  df-suc 2205  df-om 2373  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-f 2434  df-f1 2435  df-fo 2436  df-f1o 2437  df-fv 2438  df-rdg 2970  df-er 3200  df-en 3274  df-dom 3275  df-sdom 3276  df-card 3623  df-aleph 3624
metamath.org