Theorem ceqsexgv 1412

Description: Elimination of an existential quantifier, using implicit substitution.

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv.1	|- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsexgv	|- (A e. B -> (E.x(x = A /\ ph) <-> ps))

Distinct variable group(s):   x,A   ps,x

Proof of Theorem ceqsexgv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-17 925	. 2 |- (ps -> A.xps)
2		ceqsexgv.1	. 2 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
3	1, 2	ceqsexg 1411	1 |- (A e. B -> (E.x(x = A /\ ph) <-> ps))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196  E.wex 678   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsrexv 1413  imasn 2616  elxp5 2641  fvopabn 2873  xpsnen 3339

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-v 1349

metamath.org