HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem dfoprab2 3021
Description: Class abstraction for operations in terms of class abstraction of ordered pairs.
Assertion
Ref Expression
dfoprab2 |- {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} = {<.w, z>. | E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)}
Distinct variable group(s):   x,z,w   y,z,w   ph,w

Proof of Theorem dfoprab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 excom 728 . . . 4 |- (E.zE.wE.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.wE.zE.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
2 exrot4 778 . . . . 5 |- (E.zE.wE.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.xE.yE.zE.w(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
3 19.42v 966 . . . . . . 7 |- (E.w((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ w = <.x, y>.) <-> ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ E.w w = <.x, y>.))
4 opeq1 1876 . . . . . . . . . . . 12 |- (w = <.x, y>. -> <.w, z>. = <.<.x, y>., z>.)
54cleq2d 1112 . . . . . . . . . . 11 |- (w = <.x, y>. -> (v = <.w, z>. <-> v = <.<.x, y>., z>.))
65pm5.32ri 490 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- ((v = <.w, z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.) <-> (v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.))
76anbi1i 368 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (((v = <.w, z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.) /\ ph) <-> ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.) /\ ph))
8 anass 336 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (((v = <.w, z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.) /\ ph) <-> (v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
9 an23 371 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ w = <.x, y>.) /\ ph) <-> ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ w = <.x, y>.))
107, 8, 93bitr3 156 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ w = <.x, y>.))
1110biex 733 . . . . . . 7 |- (E.w(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.w((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ w = <.x, y>.))
12 opex 1893 . . . . . . . . 9 |- <.x, y>. e. V
1312isseti 1352 . . . . . . . 8 |- E.w w = <.x, y>.
1413biantru 543 . . . . . . 7 |- ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) <-> ((v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) /\ E.w w = <.x, y>.))
153, 11, 143bitr4 158 . . . . . 6 |- (E.w(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> (v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph))
1615bi3ex 735 . . . . 5 |- (E.xE.yE.zE.w(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph))
172, 16bitr 151 . . . 4 |- (E.zE.wE.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph))
18 19.42vv 968 . . . . 5 |- (E.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> (v = <.w, z>. /\ E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
1918bi2ex 734 . . . 4 |- (E.wE.zE.xE.y(v = <.w, z>. /\ (w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)) <-> E.wE.z(v = <.w, z>. /\ E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
201, 17, 193bitr3 156 . . 3 |- (E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) <-> E.wE.z(v = <.w, z>. /\ E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)))
2120biabi 1181 . 2 |- {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)} = {v | E.wE.z(v = <.w, z>. /\ E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph))}
22 df-oprab 3004 . 2 |- {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} = {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)}
23 df-opab 2098 . 2 |- {<.w, z>. | E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)} = {v | E.wE.z(v = <.w, z>. /\ E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph))}
2421, 22, 233eqtr4 1126 1 |- {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} = {<.w, z>. | E.xE.y(w = <.x, y>. /\ ph)}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   /\ wa 196  E.wex 678  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091  <.cop 1810  {copab 2055  {copab2 3002
This theorem is referenced by:  reloprab 3022  bioprabd 3025  cbvoprab3v 3030  dmoprab 3031  rnoprab 3033  ssoprab2i 3036  funoprab 3037  fnoprval 3042
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-opab 2098  df-oprab 3004
metamath.org