Theorem elabg 1417

Description: Membership in a class abstraction with implicit substitution. Compare Theorem 6.13 of [Quine] p. 44.

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
elabg.1	|- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
elabg	|- (A e. B -> (A e. {x | ph} <-> ps))

Distinct variable group(s):   ps,x   x,A

Proof of Theorem elabg

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-17 925	. 2 |- (y e. A -> A.x y e. A)
2		ax-17 925	. 2 |- (ps -> A.xps)
3		elabg.1	. 2 |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ps))
4	1, 2, 3	elabgf 1416	1 |- (A e. B -> (A e. {x | ph} <-> ps))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092

This theorem is referenced by:  elab2g 1418  elab3g 1420  finds 2397  scott0 3542  nnind 4434

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-v 1349

metamath.org