HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem en3d 3304
Description: Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
en3d.1 |- (ph -> A e. V)
en3d.2 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> C e. B))
en3d.3 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> D e. A))
en3d.4 |- (ph -> ((x e. A /\ y e. B) -> (x = D <-> y = C)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
en3d |- (ph -> A ~~ B)
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,A   x,B,y   y,C   x,D   ph,x,y

Proof of Theorem en3d
StepHypRef Expression
1 en3d.1 . 2 |- (ph -> A e. V)
2 en3d.2 . . 3 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> C e. B))
3 elisset 1354 . . 3 |- (C e. B -> C e. V)
42, 3syl6 23 . 2 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> C e. V))
5 en3d.3 . . 3 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> D e. A))
6 elisset 1354 . . 3 |- (D e. A -> D e. V)
75, 6syl6 23 . 2 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> D e. V))
8 eleq1a 1158 . . . . . . 7 |- (C e. B -> (y = C -> y e. B))
92, 8syl6 23 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> (y = C -> y e. B)))
109imp32 281 . . . . 5 |- ((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y = C)) -> y e. B)
11 en3d.4 . . . . . . . . . 10 |- (ph -> ((x e. A /\ y e. B) -> (x = D <-> y = C)))
1211imp 277 . . . . . . . . 9 |- ((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y e. B)) -> (x = D <-> y = C))
1312biimpar 325 . . . . . . . 8 |- (((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y e. B)) /\ y = C) -> x = D)
1413exp42 300 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> (y e. B -> (y = C -> x = D))))
1514com34 36 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> (y = C -> (y e. B -> x = D))))
1615imp32 281 . . . . 5 |- ((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y = C)) -> (y e. B -> x = D))
1710, 16jcai 237 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y = C)) -> (y e. B /\ x = D))
1817exp 291 . . 3 |- (ph -> ((x e. A /\ y = C) -> (y e. B /\ x = D)))
19 eleq1a 1158 . . . . . . 7 |- (D e. A -> (x = D -> x e. A))
205, 19syl6 23 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> (x = D -> x e. A)))
2120imp32 281 . . . . 5 |- ((ph /\ (y e. B /\ x = D)) -> x e. A)
2212biimpa 324 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (((ph /\ (x e. A /\ y e. B)) /\ x = D) -> y = C)
2322exp42 300 . . . . . . . 8 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> (y e. B -> (x = D -> y = C))))
2423com23 32 . . . . . . 7 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> (x e. A -> (x = D -> y = C))))
2524com34 36 . . . . . 6 |- (ph -> (y e. B -> (x = D -> (x e. A -> y = C))))
2625imp32 281 . . . . 5 |- ((ph /\ (y e. B /\ x = D)) -> (x e. A -> y = C))
2721, 26jcai 237 . . . 4 |- ((ph /\ (y e. B /\ x = D)) -> (x e. A /\ y = C))
2827exp 291 . . 3 |- (ph -> ((y e. B /\ x = D) -> (x e. A /\ y = C)))
2918, 28impbid 397 . 2 |- (ph -> ((x e. A /\ y = C) <-> (y e. B /\ x = D)))
301, 4, 7, 29en2d 3303 1 |- (ph -> A ~~ B)
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  Vcvv 1348   class class class wbr 2054   ~~ cen 3271
This theorem is referenced by:  en3 3306  fundmen 3333  mapunen 3397  ssenen 3399
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-id 2125  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-f 2434  df-f1 2435  df-fo 2436  df-f1o 2437  df-en 3274
metamath.org