HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem er2 3201
Description: Alternate definition of equivalence predicate.
Assertion
Ref Expression
er2 |- (Er R <-> A.xA.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,z,R

Proof of Theorem er2
StepHypRef Expression
1 df-er 3200 . 2 |- (Er R <-> (`'R u. (R o. R)) (_ R)
2 cnvsym 2626 . . . 4 |- (`'R (_ R <-> A.xA.y(xRy -> yRx))
3 cotr 2625 . . . 4 |- ((R o. R) (_ R <-> A.xA.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz))
42, 3anbi12i 369 . . 3 |- ((`'R (_ R /\ (R o. R) (_ R) <-> (A.xA.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.xA.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
5 unss 1632 . . 3 |- ((`'R (_ R /\ (R o. R) (_ R) <-> (`'R u. (R o. R)) (_ R)
6 19.28v 957 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> ((xRy -> yRx) /\ A.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
76bial 695 . . . . . 6 |- (A.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> A.y((xRy -> yRx) /\ A.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
8 19.26 749 . . . . . 6 |- (A.y((xRy -> yRx) /\ A.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> (A.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
97, 8bitr 151 . . . . 5 |- (A.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> (A.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
109bial 695 . . . 4 |- (A.xA.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> A.x(A.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
11 19.26 749 . . . 4 |- (A.x(A.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> (A.xA.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.xA.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
1210, 11bitr2 152 . . 3 |- ((A.xA.y(xRy -> yRx) /\ A.xA.yA.z((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)) <-> A.xA.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
134, 5, 123bitr3 156 . 2 |- ((`'R u. (R o. R)) (_ R <-> A.xA.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
141, 13bitr 151 1 |- (Er R <-> A.xA.yA.z((xRy -> yRx) /\ ((xRy /\ yRz) -> xRz)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196  A.wal 672   u. cun 1485   (_ wss 1487   class class class wbr 2054  `'ccnv 2409   o. ccom 2414  Er wer 3197
This theorem is referenced by:  ster 3207  ersym 3209  ertr 3211
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-er 3200
metamath.org