HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem find 2396
Description: The Principle of Finite Induction (mathematical induction). Corollary 7.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 43. The simpler hypothesis shown here was suggested in an email from "Colin" on 1-Oct-01. The hypothesis states that A is a set of natural numbers, zero belongs to A, and given any member of A the member's successor also belongs to A. The conclusion is that every natural number is in A.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
find.1 |- (A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A)
Assertion
Ref Expression
find |- A = om
Distinct variable group(s):   x,A

Proof of Theorem find
StepHypRef Expression
1 find.1 . . 3 |- (A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A)
2 3simp1 594 . . 3 |- ((A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A) -> A (_ om)
31, 2ax-mp 6 . 2 |- A (_ om
4 ax-1 3 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (suc x e. A -> (x e. om -> suc x e. A))
54r19.20si 1254 . . . . . . . 8 |- (A.x e. A suc x e. A -> A.x e. A (x e. om -> suc x e. A))
6 ralcom3 1315 . . . . . . . 8 |- (A.x e. A (x e. om -> suc x e. A) <-> A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A))
75, 6sylib 173 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.x e. A suc x e. A -> A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A))
87anim2i 270 . . . . . 6 |- (((/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A) -> ((/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A)))
98anim2i 270 . . . . 5 |- ((A (_ om /\ ((/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A)) -> (A (_ om /\ ((/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A))))
10 3anass 585 . . . . 5 |- ((A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A) <-> (A (_ om /\ ((/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A)))
11 3anass 585 . . . . 5 |- ((A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A)) <-> (A (_ om /\ ((/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A))))
129, 10, 113imtr4 192 . . . 4 |- ((A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. A suc x e. A) -> (A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A)))
131, 12ax-mp 6 . . 3 |- (A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A))
14 peano5 2394 . . . 4 |- (((/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A)) -> om (_ A)
15143adant1 597 . . 3 |- ((A (_ om /\ (/) e. A /\ A.x e. om (x e. A -> suc x e. A)) -> om (_ A)
1613, 15ax-mp 6 . 2 |- om (_ A
173, 16eqssi 1517 1 |- A = om
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   /\ wa 196   /\ w3a 581   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  A.wral 1201   (_ wss 1487  (/)c0 1707  suc csuc 2201  omcom 2372
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-if 1777  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-lim 2204  df-suc 2205  df-om 2373
metamath.org