HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hboprab2 3024
Description: The abstraction variables in an operation abstraction are not free.
Assertion
Ref Expression
hboprab2 |- (w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} -> A.y w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph})
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,z   y,w

Proof of Theorem hboprab2
StepHypRef Expression
1 hbe1 709 . . . 4 |- (E.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) -> A.yE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph))
21hbex 701 . . 3 |- (E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph) -> A.yE.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph))
32hbab 1096 . 2 |- (w e. {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)} -> A.y w e. {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)})
4 df-oprab 3004 . . 3 |- {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} = {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)}
54eleq2i 1153 . 2 |- (w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} <-> w e. {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)})
65bial 695 . 2 |- (A.y w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} <-> A.y w e. {v | E.xE.yE.z(v = <.<.x, y>., z>. /\ ph)})
73, 5, 63imtr4 192 1 |- (w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph} -> A.y w e. {<.<.x, y>., z>. | ph})
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -> wi 2   /\ wa 196  A.wal 672  E.wex 678  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  <.cop 1810  {copab2 3002
This theorem is referenced by:  elrnoprab 3054  mapxpen 3390
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-oprab 3004
metamath.org