HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem hbsb4 905
Description: A variable not free remains so after substitution with a distinct variable.
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
hbsb4.1 |- (ph -> A.zph)
Assertion
Ref Expression
hbsb4 |- (-. A.z z = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))

Proof of Theorem hbsb4
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-8 798 . . . . . . 7 |- (x = z -> (x = y -> z = y))
21a4s 682 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x x = z -> (x = y -> z = y))
32eq4s 822 . . . . 5 |- (A.z z = x -> (x = y -> z = y))
43del35 836 . . . 4 |- (A.z z = x -> (A.x x = y -> A.z z = y))
54con3d 87 . . 3 |- (A.z z = x -> (-. A.z z = y -> -. A.x x = y))
6 hbsb2 873 . . . 4 |- (-. A.x x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.x[y / x]ph))
7 ax-10 800 . . . . 5 |- (A.x x = z -> (A.x[y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
87eq4s 822 . . . 4 |- (A.z z = x -> (A.x[y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
96, 8syl9r 56 . . 3 |- (A.z z = x -> (-. A.x x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)))
105, 9syld 27 . 2 |- (A.z z = x -> (-. A.z z = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)))
11 eq5 824 . . . . . 6 |- (A.x x = y -> A.zA.x x = y)
12 ax-4 673 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.x x = y -> x = y)
131219.20i 691 . . . . . 6 |- (A.zA.x x = y -> A.z x = y)
14 sbequ2 864 . . . . . . . 8 |- (x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> ph))
1514a4s 682 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.z x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> ph))
16 sbequ1 863 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (x = y -> (ph -> [y / x]ph))
171619.20ii 692 . . . . . . . 8 |- (A.z x = y -> (A.zph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
18 hbsb4.1 . . . . . . . 8 |- (ph -> A.zph)
1917, 18syl5 22 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.z x = y -> (ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
2015, 19syld 27 . . . . . 6 |- (A.z x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
2111, 13, 203syl 21 . . . . 5 |- (A.x x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
2221a1d 14 . . . 4 |- (A.x x = y -> ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)))
23 sb4 861 . . . . 5 |- (-. A.x x = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.x(x = y -> ph)))
24 eq6 826 . . . . . . . 8 |- (-. A.z z = x -> A.x -. A.z z = x)
25 eq6 826 . . . . . . . 8 |- (-. A.z z = y -> A.x -. A.z z = y)
2624, 25hban 704 . . . . . . 7 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> A.x(-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y))
27 eq6 826 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (-. A.z z = x -> A.z -. A.z z = x)
28 eq6 826 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (-. A.z z = y -> A.z -. A.z z = y)
2927, 28hban 704 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> A.z(-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y))
30 ax-12 802 . . . . . . . . 9 |- (-. A.z z = x -> (-. A.z z = y -> (x = y -> A.z x = y)))
3130imp 277 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> (x = y -> A.z x = y))
3218a1i 7 . . . . . . . 8 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> (ph -> A.zph))
3329, 31, 32hbimd 787 . . . . . . 7 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> ((x = y -> ph) -> A.z(x = y -> ph)))
3426, 3319.20d 693 . . . . . 6 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> A.xA.z(x = y -> ph)))
35 sb2 859 . . . . . . . 8 |- (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> [y / x]ph)
363519.20i 691 . . . . . . 7 |- (A.zA.x(x = y -> ph) -> A.z[y / x]ph)
3736a7s 689 . . . . . 6 |- (A.xA.z(x = y -> ph) -> A.z[y / x]ph)
3834, 37syl6 23 . . . . 5 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> (A.x(x = y -> ph) -> A.z[y / x]ph))
3923, 38syl9 55 . . . 4 |- (-. A.x x = y -> ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)))
4022, 39pm2.61i 110 . . 3 |- ((-. A.z z = x /\ -. A.z z = y) -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
4140exp 291 . 2 |- (-. A.z z = x -> (-. A.z z = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph)))
4210, 41pm2.61i 110 1 |- (-. A.z z = y -> ([y / x]ph -> A.z[y / x]ph))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 1   -> wi 2   /\ wa 196  A.wal 672   = weq 797  [wsb 852
This theorem is referenced by:  hbsb4t 906  ddelimf 908  sbco2 913  hbsb 987  sbal1 996  hbab 1096
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853
metamath.org