HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem luklem6 666
Description: Lemma for rederiving standard propositional axioms from Lukasiewicz'.
Assertion
Ref Expression
luklem6 |- ((ph -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps))

Proof of Theorem luklem6
StepHypRef Expression
1 luk-1 658 . 2 |- ((ph -> (ph -> ps)) -> (((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)))
2 luklem5 665 . . . . . 6 |- (-. (ph -> ps) -> (-. ps -> -. (ph -> ps)))
3 luklem2 662 . . . . . . 7 |- ((-. ps -> -. (ph -> ps)) -> (((-. ps -> ps) -> ps) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps)))
4 luklem4 664 . . . . . . 7 |- ((((-. ps -> ps) -> ps) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps)) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps))
53, 4luklem1 661 . . . . . 6 |- ((-. ps -> -. (ph -> ps)) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps))
62, 5luklem1 661 . . . . 5 |- (-. (ph -> ps) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps))
7 luk-1 658 . . . . 5 |- ((-. (ph -> ps) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps)) -> ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps))))
86, 7ax-mp 6 . . . 4 |- ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)))
9 luk-1 658 . . . 4 |- (((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps))) -> (((-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps)) -> ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps))))
108, 9ax-mp 6 . . 3 |- (((-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps)) -> ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps)))
11 luklem4 664 . . 3 |- ((((-. (ph -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps)) -> ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps))) -> ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps)))
1210, 11ax-mp 6 . 2 |- ((((ph -> ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps))
131, 12luklem1 661 1 |- ((ph -> (ph -> ps)) -> (ph -> ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 1   -> wi 2
This theorem is referenced by:  luklem7 667  ax2 670
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6
metamath.org