HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer
Most Recent Proofs
Last updated on 12-Jan-05 at 12:52 AM ET.
A theorem a day prevents mental decay. —mathematician Eric Charles Milner (1928-1997)

Most Recent Proofs    These are the 100 most recent proofs in the Metamath Proof Explorer and the Hilbert Space Explorer. To understand how to follow the proofs, read How Proofs Work. If this is a mirror site, the live site may have more recent updates. Email comments to Norm Megill.

Also new:
(9-Jan-05) If you are a user of set.mm: The ubiquitous biconditional theorems birand, etc. were renamed to anbi1d, etc. for consistency with the equality analogues ineq1d, etc. See the recent label change list at the beginning of set.mm. Thanks to Raph Levien for pointing out the inconsistency.
(6-Jan-05) Someone assembled an amazon.com list of some of the books in the Metamath Proof Explorer Bibliography.
(4-Jan-05) The definition of ordinal exponentiation was decided on after this Usenet discussion.
(21-Dec-04) The Germany site de.metamath.org was moved to a much faster mirror. Try it!
(20-Dec-04) The us.metamath.org mirror (linked on the Metamath Site Selection page) will be down while it is being revamped, and us.metamath.org has been temporarily changed to an alias for au.metamath.org. If you are curious, here are some site usage statistics for us.metamath.org last year that I grabbed before it went offline: Jan., Apr., Nov., Dec. 1 - Dec. 19, 2004 summary. April 19th shows a spike when this site was mentioned in a slashdot.org comment.
(19-Dec-04) A bit of trivia: my Erdös number is 2, as you can see from this list.
(20-Oct-04) I started this Usenet discussion about the "reals are uncountable" proof (127 comments; last one on Nov. 12).
(18-Oct-04) A description of the proof that the reals are uncountable was added to the Real and Complex Numbers page.
(12-Oct-04) gch-kn shows the equivalence of the Generalized Continuum Hypothesis and Prof. Nambiar's Axiom of Combinatorial Sets. This proof answers his Open Problem 2 (PDF file).
(12-Oct-04) I ran across a comment about the Metamath Music Page.
(16-Aug-04) Mel O'Cat shortened the proofs of com4l and pm2.43.
(15-Aug-04) The Quantum Logic section of the Hilbert Space Explorer now shows theorems that correspond directly to the axioms for the Quantum Logic Explorer, thus eliminating the previous "exercise for the reader" (which is doubtful that any reader actually worked out :)).
(5-Aug-04) I gave a talk on "Hilbert Lattice Equations" at the Argonne workshop.
(25-Jul-04) The theorem nthruz is the 4000th theorem added to the Metamath Proof Explorer database.
(29-May-04) Bob Solovay wrote a nicely commented Metamath database, peano.mm, that presents Peano arithmetic as a stand-alone axiomatic system (no set theory).
(27-May-04) Josiah Burroughs contributed the proofs u1lemn1b, u1lem3var1, oi3oa3lem1, and oi3oa3 to the Quantum Logic Explorer database ql.mm.
(23-May-04) Some minor typos found by Josh Purinton were corrected in the Metamath book. In addition, Josh simplified the definition of the closure of a pre-statement of a formal system in Appendix C.
(5-May-04) Gregory Bush has found shorter proofs for 67 of the 193 propositional calculus theorems listed in Principia Mathematica, thus establishing 67 new records. (This was challenge #4 on the open problems page.)
(1-Apr-04) (Actually added 26-May-04.) For those people still coming from urgo.org after all this time, the April Fool's theorem (a real, if nonsensical and useless, theorem) is avril1.

Color key:   Metamath Proof
Explorer  Metamath Proof Explorer   Hilbert Space Explorer  Hilbert Space Explorer  

Last updated on 12-Jan-05 at 12:52 AM ET.
Recent Additions to the Metamath Proof Explorer   informal notes on recent proofs (last updated 12-Jan-05)
DateLabelDescription
Theorem
 
12-Jan-05tfindsg2 2403 Transfinite Induction (inference schema) with implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction hypothesis for successors, and the induction hypothesis for limit ordinals. The basis of this version is an arbitrary ordinal suc B instead of zero.
|- (x = suc B -> (ph <-> ps))   &   |- (x = y -> (ph <-> ch))   &   |- (x = suc y -> (ph <-> th))   &   |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ta ))   &   |- (B e. On -> ps)   &   |- ((y e. On /\ B e. y) -> (ch -> th))   &   |- ((Lim x /\ B e. x) -> (A.y e. x (B e. y -> ch) -> ph))   =>   |- ((A e. On /\ B e. A) -> ta )
 
12-Jan-05bigolden 513 Dijkstra-Scholten's Golden Rule for calculational proofs.
|- (((ph /\ ps) <-> ph) <-> (ps <-> (ph \/ ps)))
 
11-Jan-05biluk 512 Lukasiewicz's shortest axiom for equivalential calculus. Storrs McCall, ed., Polish Logic 1920-1939 (Oxford, 1967), p. 96.
|- ((ph <-> ps) <-> ((ch <-> ps) <-> (ph <-> ch)))
 
11-Jan-05biass 511 Associative law for the biconditional. An axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseer.lcs.mit.edu/lifschitz98calculational.html. Noted by Jan Lukasiewicz c. 1923.
|- (((ph <-> ps) <-> ch) <-> (ph <-> (ps <-> ch)))
 
11-Jan-05xor 500 Two ways to express "exclusive or". Theorem *5.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124.
|- (-. (ph <-> ps) <-> ((ph /\ -. ps) \/ (ps /\ -. ph)))
 
11-Jan-05or42 221 Rearrangement of 4 disjuncts.
|- (((ph \/ ps) \/ (ch \/ th)) <-> ((ph \/ ch) \/ (th \/ ps)))
 
10-Jan-05oen0 3165 Ordinal exponentiation with a nonzero mantissa is nonzero. Proposition 8.32 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- (((A e. On /\ B e. On) /\ (/) e. A) -> (/) e. (A ^o B))
 
10-Jan-05omordi 3164 Ordering property of ordinal multiplication. Half of Proposition 8.19 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 63.
|- (((B e. On /\ C e. On) /\ (/) e. C) -> (A e. B -> (C .o A) e. (C .o B)))
 
9-Jan-05orbidi 510 Disjunction distributes over the biconditional. An axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseer.lcs.mit.edu/lifschitz98calculational.html.
|- ((ph \/ (ps <-> ch)) <-> ((ph \/ ps) <-> (ph \/ ch)))
 
9-Jan-05imbi2 473 Theorem *4.85 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122.
|- ((ph <-> ps) -> ((ch -> ph) <-> (ch -> ps)))
 
9-Jan-05imbi1 472 Theorem *4.84 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122.
|- ((ph <-> ps) -> ((ph -> ch) <-> (ps -> ch)))
 
9-Jan-05pm2.85 439 Theorem *2.85 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108.
|- (((ph \/ ps) -> (ph \/ ch)) -> (ph \/ (ps -> ch)))
 
9-Jan-05pm2.48 230 Theorem *2.48 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|- (-. (ph \/ ps) -> (ph \/ -. ps))
 
8-Jan-05oe1m 3147 Ordinal exponentiation with a mantissa of 1. Proposition 8.31(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- (A e. On -> (1o ^o A) = 1o)
 
8-Jan-05oe1 3146 Ordinal exponentiation with an exponent of 1.
|- (A e. On -> (A ^o 1o) = A)
 
8-Jan-05oe0lem 3121 A helper lemma for oe0 3130 and others.
|- ((ph /\ A = (/)) -> ps)   &   |- (((A e. On /\ ph) /\ (/) e. A) -> ps)   =>   |- ((A e. On /\ ph) -> ps)
 
8-Jan-050lt1o 3116 Ordinal zero is less than ordinal one.
|- (/) e. 1o
 
8-Jan-05el1o 3115 Membership in ordinal one.
|- (A e. 1o <-> A = (/))
 
8-Jan-05pm2.46 229 Theorem *2.46 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106.
|- (-. (ph \/ ps) -> -. ps)
 
8-Jan-05pm2.45 228 Theorem *2.45 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 106.
|- (-. (ph \/ ps) -> -. ph)
 
8-Jan-05pm2.36 91 Theorem *2.36 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105.
|- ((ps -> ch) -> ((-. ph -> ps) -> (-. ch -> ph)))
 
7-Jan-05oecl 3140 Closure law for ordinal exponentiation.
|- ((A e. On /\ B e. On) -> (A ^o B) e. On)
 
7-Jan-05tfinds3 2406 Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema) with implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction hypothesis for successors, and the induction hypothesis for limit ordinals.
|- (x = (/) -> (ph <-> ps))   &   |- (x = y -> (ph <-> ch))   &   |- (x = suc y -> (ph <-> th))   &   |- (x = A -> (ph <-> ta ))   &   |- (et -> ps)   &   |- (y e. On -> (et -> (ch -> th)))   &   |- (Lim x -> (et -> (A.y e. x ch -> ph)))   =>   |- (A e. On -> (et -> ta ))
 
7-Jan-05mpan121 533 An inference based on modus ponens.
|- ps   &   |- (((ph /\ (ps /\ ch)) /\ th) -> ta )   =>   |- (((ph /\ ch) /\ th) -> ta )
 
7-Jan-05pm2.1 495 Theorem *2.1 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 101.
|- (-. ph \/ ph)
 
6-Jan-05ledivt 4405 Division of both sides of a less than or equal to relation by a positive number.
|- ((A e. RR /\ B e. RR /\ C e. RR) -> (0 < C -> (A <_ B <-> (A / C) <_ (B / C))))
 
6-Jan-05pm2.67 231 Theorem *2.67 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|- (((ph \/ ps) -> ps) -> (ph -> ps))
 
6-Jan-05pm2.621 211 Theorem *2.621 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|- ((ph -> ps) -> ((ph \/ ps) -> ps))
 
6-Jan-05pm2.62 210 Theorem *2.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 107.
|- ((ph \/ ps) -> ((ph -> ps) -> ps))
 
6-Jan-05pm2.24 72 Theorem *2.24 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104.
|- (ph -> (-. ph -> ps))
 
5-Jan-05spansnss2t 5480 The span of the singleton of an element of a subspace is included in the subspace.
|- ((A e. SH /\ B e. H~) -> (B e. A <-> (span` {B}) (_ A))
 
5-Jan-05oelim 3137 Ordinal exponentiation with a limit exponent and nonzero mantissa. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- (((A e. On /\ (B e. C /\ Lim B)) /\ (/) e. A) -> (A ^o B) = U.x e. B (A ^o x))
 
5-Jan-05oesuc 3134 Ordinal exponentiation with a successor exponent. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- ((A e. On /\ B e. On) -> (A ^o suc B) = ((A ^o B) .o A))
 
5-Jan-05adantlrr 315 Deduction adding a conjunct to an antecedent.
|- (((ph /\ ps) /\ ch) -> th)   =>   |- (((ph /\ (ps /\ ta )) /\ ch) -> th)
 
4-Jan-05oe0 3130 Ordinal exponentiation with zero exponent. Definition 8.30 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- (A e. On -> (A ^o (/)) = 1o)
 
4-Jan-05oe0m1 3129 Ordinal exponentiation with zero mantissa and nonzero exponent. Proposition 8.31(2) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- ((A e. On /\ (/) e. A) -> ((/) ^o A) = (/))
 
3-Jan-05shjshsel 5413 A closed subspace sum equals Hilbert lattice join. Part of Lemma 31.1.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 136.
|- A e. SH   &   |- B e. SH   =>   |- ((A +H B) e. CH <-> (A +H B) = (A vH B))
 
3-Jan-05shsvst 5288 Vector subtraction belongs to subspace sum.
|- ((A e. SH /\ B e. SH) -> ((C e. A /\ D e. B) -> (C -v D) e. (A +H B)))
 
3-Jan-05shsclt 5283 Closure of subspace sum.
|- ((A e. SH /\ B e. SH) -> (A +H B) e. SH)
 
3-Jan-05oe0m0 3128 Ordinal exponentiation with zero mantissa and zero exponent. Proposition 8.31 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 67.
|- ((/) ^o (/)) = 1o
 
3-Jan-05oe0m 3127 Ordinal exponentiation with zero mantissa.
|- (A e. On -> ((/) ^o A) = (1o \ A))
 
3-Jan-05pm2.61an2 365 Elimination of an antecedent.
|- ((ph /\ ps) -> ch)   &   |- ((ph /\ -. ps) -> ch)   =>   |- (ph -> ch)
 
3-Jan-05pm2.61an1 364 Elimination of an antecedent.
|- ((ph /\ ps) -> ch)   &   |- ((-. ph /\ ps) -> ch)   =>   |- (ps -> ch)
 
2-Jan-05oevn0 3123 Value of ordinal exponentiation at a nonzero mantissa.
|- (((A e. On /\ B e. On) /\ (/) e. A) -> (A ^o B) = (rec({<.x, y>. | y = (x .o A)}, 1o)` B))
 
2-Jan-05iunab 2023 The indexed union of a class abstraction.
|- U.x e. A {y | ph} = {y | E.x e. A ph}
 
2-Jan-05syl3anc 629 A syllogism inference combined with contraction.
|- ((ph /\ ps /\ ch) -> th)   &   |- (ta -> ph)   &   |- (ta -> ps)   &   |- (ta -> ch)   =>   |- (ta -> th)
 
2-Jan-05sylan12 355 A syllogism inference.
|- (((ph /\ ps) /\ ch) -> th)   &   |- (ta -> ps)   =>   |- (((ph /\ ta ) /\ ch) -> th)
 
1-Jan-05oev 3122 Value of ordinal exponentiation.
|- ((A e. On /\ B e. On) -> (A ^o B) = if(A = (/), (1o \ B), (rec({<.x, y>. | y = (x .o A)}, 1o)` B)))
 
1-Jan-05ordgt0ge1 3114 Two ways of expressing that an ordinal class is positive.
|- (Ord A -> ((/) e. A <-> 1o (_ A))
 
1-Jan-05rabab 1359 A class abstraction restricted to the universe is unrestricted.
|- {x e. V | ph} = {x | ph}
 
1-Jan-05pm5.32rd 492 Distribution of implication over biconditional (deduction rule).
|- (ph -> (ps -> (ch <-> th)))   =>   |- (ph -> ((ch /\ ps) <-> (th /\ ps)))
 
31-Dec-04elcard 3713 Membership in the class of cardinal numbers.
|- (A e. Card <-> (card` A) = A)
 
31-Dec-04adantrrr 319 Deduction adding a conjunct to an antecedent.
|- ((ph /\ (ps /\ ch)) -> th)   =>   |- ((ph /\ (ps /\ (ch /\ ta ))) -> th)
 
31-Dec-04adantrrl 318 Deduction adding a conjunct to an antecedent.
|- ((ph /\ (ps /\ ch)) -> th)   =>   |- ((ph /\ (ps /\ (ta /\ ch))) -> th)
 
31-Dec-04adantrlr 317 Deduction adding a conjunct to an antecedent.
|- ((ph /\ (ps