Theorem r19.22d 1276

Description: Deduction from Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
r19.22d.1	|- (ph -> A.xph)
r19.22d.2	|- (ph -> (x e. A -> (ps -> ch)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r19.22d	|- (ph -> (E.x e. A ps -> E.x e. A ch))

Proof of Theorem r19.22d

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		r19.22d.1	. . 3 |- (ph -> A.xph)
2		r19.22d.2	. . 3 |- (ph -> (x e. A -> (ps -> ch)))
3	1, 2	r19.21ai 1258	. 2 |- (ph -> A.x e. A (ps -> ch))
4		r19.22 1272	. 2 |- (A.x e. A (ps -> ch) -> (E.x e. A ps -> E.x e. A ch))
5	3, 4	syl 12	1 |- (ph -> (E.x e. A ps -> E.x e. A ch))

Syntax hints:   -> wi 2  A.wal 672   e. wcel 1092  A.wral 1201  E.wrex 1202

This theorem is referenced by:  r19.22dv 1278  ss2iun 2005  chfnrn 2885  tz7.49 2997  r1tr 3498

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-gen 677

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206

metamath.org