HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem reeanv 1316
Description: Rearrange existential quantifiers.
Assertion
Ref Expression
reeanv |- (E.x e. A E.y e. B (ph /\ ps) <-> (E.x e. A ph /\ E.y e. B ps))
Distinct variable group(s):   ph,y   ps,x   x,y   y,A   x,B

Proof of Theorem reeanv
StepHypRef Expression
1 anass 336 . . . . 5 |- (((x e. A /\ y e. B) /\ (ph /\ ps)) <-> (x e. A /\ (y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))))
2 an4 388 . . . . 5 |- (((x e. A /\ y e. B) /\ (ph /\ ps)) <-> ((x e. A /\ ph) /\ (y e. B /\ ps)))
31, 2bitr3 153 . . . 4 |- ((x e. A /\ (y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))) <-> ((x e. A /\ ph) /\ (y e. B /\ ps)))
43bi2ex 734 . . 3 |- (E.xE.y(x e. A /\ (y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))) <-> E.xE.y((x e. A /\ ph) /\ (y e. B /\ ps)))
5 exdistr 967 . . 3 |- (E.xE.y(x e. A /\ (y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))) <-> E.x(x e. A /\ E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))))
6 eeanv 980 . . 3 |- (E.xE.y((x e. A /\ ph) /\ (y e. B /\ ps)) <-> (E.x(x e. A /\ ph) /\ E.y(y e. B /\ ps)))
74, 5, 63bitr3 156 . 2 |- (E.x(x e. A /\ E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))) <-> (E.x(x e. A /\ ph) /\ E.y(y e. B /\ ps)))
8 df-rex 1206 . . . 4 |- (E.y e. B (ph /\ ps) <-> E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps)))
98birex 1224 . . 3 |- (E.x e. A E.y e. B (ph /\ ps) <-> E.x e. A E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps)))
10 df-rex 1206 . . 3 |- (E.x e. A E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps)) <-> E.x(x e. A /\ E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))))
119, 10bitr 151 . 2 |- (E.x e. A E.y e. B (ph /\ ps) <-> E.x(x e. A /\ E.y(y e. B /\ (ph /\ ps))))
12 df-rex 1206 . . 3 |- (E.x e. A ph <-> E.x(x e. A /\ ph))
13 df-rex 1206 . . 3 |- (E.y e. B ps <-> E.y(y e. B /\ ps))
1412, 13anbi12i 369 . 2 |- ((E.x e. A ph /\ E.y e. B ps) <-> (E.x(x e. A /\ ph) /\ E.y(y e. B /\ ps)))
157, 11, 143bitr4 158 1 |- (E.x e. A E.y e. B (ph /\ ps) <-> (E.x e. A ph /\ E.y e. B ps))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   <-> wb 127   /\ wa 196  E.wex 678   e. wcel 1092  E.wrex 1202
This theorem is referenced by:  tfrlem5 2953  unfi 3441  kmlem8 3587  climunii 4883  infxpidmlem7 4939  hlimunii 5143  pjthu 5241  pjthu2 5242  pjpj0 5259
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-17 925
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-rex 1206
metamath.org