HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
Unicode version

Theorem tfrlem13 2961
Description: Lemma for transfinite recursion. If dom F is in On, then C is acceptable, and thus a subset of F, but dom C is bigger than dom F. This is a contradiction, so dom F must be On.
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
tfrlem.1 |- A = {f | E.x e. On (f Fn x /\ A.y e. x (f` y) = (G` (f |` y)))}
tfrlem.2 |- F = U.A
tfrlem.3 |- C = (F u. {<.dom F, (G` (F |` dom F))>.})
Assertion
Ref Expression
tfrlem13 |- dom F = On
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,f,A   x,F,y,f   x,G,y,f   x,C,y,f

Proof of Theorem tfrlem13
StepHypRef Expression
1 tfrlem.1 . . . 4 |- A = {f | E.x e. On (f Fn x /\ A.y e. x (f` y) = (G` (f |` y)))}
2 tfrlem.2 . . . 4 |- F = U.A
31, 2tfrlem8 2956 . . 3 |- Ord dom F
4 ordeirr 2217 . . . 4 |- (Ord dom F -> -. dom F e. dom F)
5 elssuni 1940 . . . . . . 7 |- (C e. A -> C (_ U.A)
65, 2syl6ssr 1547 . . . . . 6 |- (C e. A -> C (_ F)
7 dmss 2530 . . . . . 6 |- (C (_ F -> dom C (_ dom F)
8 ssel 1502 . . . . . 6 |- (dom C (_ dom F -> (dom F e. dom C -> dom F e. dom F))
96, 7, 83syl 21 . . . . 5 |- (C e. A -> (dom F e. dom C -> dom F e. dom F))
10 tfrlem.3 . . . . . 6 |- C = (F u. {<.dom F, (G` (F |` dom F))>.})
111, 2, 10tfrlem12 2960 . . . . 5 |- (dom F e. On -> C e. A)
12 sucidg 2305 . . . . . 6 |- (dom F e. On -> dom F e. suc dom F)
131, 2, 10tfrlem10 2958 . . . . . . 7 |- (dom F e. On -> C Fn suc dom F)
14 fndm 2723 . . . . . . 7 |- (C Fn suc dom F -> dom C = suc dom F)
1513, 14syl 12 . . . . . 6 |- (dom F e. On -> dom C = suc dom F)
1612, 15eleqtrrd 1166 . . . . 5 |- (dom F e. On -> dom F e. dom C)
179, 11, 16sylc 62 . . . 4 |- (dom F e. On -> dom F e. dom F)
184, 17nsyl 102 . . 3 |- (Ord dom F -> -. dom F e. On)
193, 18ax-mp 6 . 2 |- -. dom F e. On
20 ordeleqon 2241 . . 3 |- (Ord dom F <-> (dom F e. On \/ dom F = On))
213, 20mpbi 164 . 2 |- (dom F e. On \/ dom F = On)
22 orel1 212 . 2 |- (-. dom F e. On -> ((dom F e. On \/ dom F = On) -> dom F = On))
2319, 21, 22mp2 43 1 |- dom F = On
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  -. wn 1   -> wi 2   \/ wo 195   /\ wa 196  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   e. wcel 1092  A.wral 1201  E.wrex 1202   u. cun 1485   (_ wss 1487  {csn 1808  <.cop 1810  U.cuni 1919  Ord word 2198  Oncon0 2199  suc csuc 2201  dom cdm 2410   |` cres 2412   Fn wfn 2417  ` cfv 2422
This theorem is referenced by:  tfr1 2962  tfr2 2963
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-sbc 1441  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-suc 2205  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-fv 2438
metamath.org