| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Theorem 19.35 of [Margaris] p. 90. This theorem is useful for moving an implication (in the form of the right-hand side) into the scope of a single existential quantifier. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 19.35 | ⊢ (∃x(φ → ψ) ↔ (∀xφ → ∃xψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19.26 749 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀x(φ ∧ ¬ ψ) ↔ (∀xφ ∧ ∀x ¬ ψ)) | |
| 2 | annim 206 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ → ψ)) | |
| 3 | 2 | bial 695 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀x(φ ∧ ¬ ψ) ↔ ∀x ¬ (φ → ψ)) |
| 4 | df-an 198 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((∀xφ ∧ ∀x ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (∀xφ → ¬ ∀x ¬ ψ)) | |
| 5 | 1, 3, 4 | 3bitr3 156 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀x ¬ (φ → ψ) ↔ ¬ (∀xφ → ¬ ∀x ¬ ψ)) |
| 6 | 5 | bicon2i 194 | . 2 ⊢ ((∀xφ → ¬ ∀x ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ ∀x ¬ (φ → ψ)) |
| 7 | df-ex 679 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃xψ ↔ ¬ ∀x ¬ ψ) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2i 160 | . 2 ⊢ ((∀xφ → ∃xψ) ↔ (∀xφ → ¬ ∀x ¬ ψ)) |
| 9 | df-ex 679 | . 2 ⊢ (∃x(φ → ψ) ↔ ¬ ∀x ¬ (φ → ψ)) | |
| 10 | 6, 8, 9 | 3bitr4r 159 | 1 ⊢ (∃x(φ → ψ) ↔ (∀xφ → ∃xψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 |
| This theorem is referenced by: 19.35i 755 19.35ri 756 19.36 757 19.37 759 19.39 761 19.24 762 19.25 763 sbequi 876 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 |