| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A chained inference from transitive law for logical equivalence. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3bitr3.1 | ⊢ (φ ↔ ψ) |
| 3bitr3.2 | ⊢ (φ ↔ χ) |
| 3bitr3.3 | ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3bitr3r | ⊢ (θ ↔ χ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3bitr3.3 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) | |
| 2 | 3bitr3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ ↔ ψ) | |
| 3 | 3bitr3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ ↔ χ) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | bitr3 153 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ ↔ χ) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | bitr3 153 | 1 ⊢ (θ ↔ χ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ↔ wb 127 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bigolden 513 ralcom4 1360 rexcom4 1361 zfpair 1891 opabid 2099 intirr 2628 dffunmof 2678 fununi 2705 tfrlem2 2950 sbthcl 3361 xpmapenlem4 3394 kmlem3 3582 ltaddsub 4320 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 |