| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A mixed syllogism inference, useful for removing a definition from both sides of an implication. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3imtr3.1 | ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| 3imtr3.2 | ⊢ (φ ↔ χ) |
| 3imtr3.3 | ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| 3imtr3 | ⊢ (χ → θ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3imtr3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ ↔ χ) | |
| 2 | 3imtr3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → ψ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | sylbir 176 | . 2 ⊢ (χ → ψ) |
| 4 | 3imtr3.3 | . 2 ⊢ (ψ ↔ θ) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | sylib 173 | 1 ⊢ (χ → θ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 |
| This theorem is referenced by: 3imtr3g 425 sbal 997 onminex 2275 tfinds2 2405 funeu2 2686 idssen 3309 xpen 3383 rankss 3531 distrlem3pr 3923 nnwos 4610 climunii 4883 hlimunii 5143 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 |