| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Introduce one conjunct as an antecedent to the another. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| abai | ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) ↔ (φ ∧ (φ → ψ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.26 256 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → φ) | |
| 2 | pm3.4 266 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → (φ → ψ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | jca 236 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → (φ ∧ (φ → ψ))) |
| 4 | pm3.26 256 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ∧ (φ → ψ)) → φ) | |
| 5 | pm3.35 278 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ∧ (φ → ψ)) → ψ) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | jca 236 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ (φ → ψ)) → (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| 7 | 3, 6 | impbi 139 | 1 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) ↔ (φ ∧ (φ → ψ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: eu2 1023 euanv 1053 r19.29 1295 dfss4 1667 difin 1670 tfrlem2 2950 choc0 5291 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |