| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction conjoining antecedent to left of consequent in nested implication. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anc2li.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anc2li | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ χ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | anc2li.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | anc2l 248 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ → (ψ → χ)) → (φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ χ)))) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | ax-mp 6 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (φ ∧ χ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: imdistani 340 eqvin.l1 851 sssn 1852 pwpw0 1883 opprc3 1908 tfis 2245 unblem3 3433 trcl 3489 rankr1 3518 ac5b 3574 nn2get 4438 sqr2irr 4782 h1datom 5483 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |