| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Conjoin antecedent to right of consequent in nested implication. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| anc2r | ⊢ ((φ → (ψ → χ)) → (φ → (ψ → (χ ∧ φ)))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.21 233 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (χ → (χ ∧ φ))) | |
| 2 | 1 | syl3d 26 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → ((ψ → χ) → (ψ → (χ ∧ φ)))) |
| 3 | 2 | a2i 8 | 1 ⊢ ((φ → (ψ → χ)) → (φ → (ψ → (χ ∧ φ)))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: anc2ri 251 ssorduni 2249 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |