| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction conjoining antecedent to left of consequent in nested implication. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ancld.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ancld | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (ψ ∧ χ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ancld.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | ancl 242 | . 2 ⊢ ((ψ → χ) → (ψ → (ψ ∧ χ))) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | syl 12 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (ψ ∧ χ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: mopick2 1057 cgsex2g 1368 cgsex4g 1369 preq12b 1874 dmcosseq 2572 relssres 2596 cores 2659 tz7.49 2997 suppsr2 4017 replimt 4798 pjthlem12 5236 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |