| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction joining two biconditionals with different antecedents. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bi2an9.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| bi2an9.2 | ⊢ (θ → (τ ↔ η)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bi2bian9 | ⊢ ((φ ∧ θ) → ((ψ ↔ τ) ↔ (χ ↔ η))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bi2an9.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | adantr 306 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ θ) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| 3 | bi2an9.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (θ → (τ ↔ η)) | |
| 4 | 3 | adantl 305 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ θ) → (τ ↔ η)) |
| 5 | 2, 4 | bibi12d 477 | 1 ⊢ ((φ ∧ θ) → ((ψ ↔ τ) ↔ (χ ↔ η))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: uzind 4603 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |