| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Formula-building rule for 2 existential quantifiers (deduction rule). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bi2aldv.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bi2exdv | ⊢ (φ → (∃x∃yψ ↔ ∃x∃yχ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bi2aldv.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | biexdv 936 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (∃yψ ↔ ∃yχ)) |
| 3 | 2 | biexdv 936 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (∃x∃yψ ↔ ∃x∃yχ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∃wex 678 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bi3exdv 939 bi4exdv 940 cbvex4v 979 copsexg 1902 elopab 2110 cbvoprab3v 3030 th3qlem1 3250 genpv 3896 genpelv 3897 genpprecl 3898 genpnnp 3902 genpass 3906 distrlem1pr 3921 distrlem5pr 3925 ltresr 4052 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 ax-17 925 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 |