HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem bi2raldva 1233
Description: Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction rule).
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
bi2raldva.1 ((φ ∧ (xAyB)) → (ψχ))
Assertion
Ref Expression
bi2raldva (φ → (∀xAyB ψ ↔ ∀xAyB χ))
Distinct variable group(s):   x,y,φ   y,A

Proof of Theorem bi2raldva
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-17 925 . 2 (φ → ∀xφ)
2 ax-17 925 . 2 (φ → ∀yφ)
3 bi2raldva.1 . 2 ((φ ∧ (xAyB)) → (ψχ))
41, 2, 3bi2ralda 1232 1 (φ → (∀xAyB ψ ↔ ∀xAyB χ))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∧ wa 196   ∈ wcel 1092  ∀wral 1201
This theorem is referenced by:  f1oweOLD 2944
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-gen 677  ax-17 925
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ral 1205
metamath.org