HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem birabdv 1343
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (deduction rule).
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
birabdv.1 (φ → (xA → (ψχ)))
Assertion
Ref Expression
birabdv (φ → {xAψ} = {xAχ})
Distinct variable group(s):   φ,x

Proof of Theorem birabdv
StepHypRef Expression
1 birabdv.1 . . . 4 (φ → (xA → (ψχ)))
21pm5.32d 491 . . 3 (φ → ((xAψ) ↔ (xAχ)))
32biabdv 1183 . 2 (φ → {x∣(xAψ)} = {x∣(xAχ)})
4 df-rab 1208 . 2 {xAψ} = {x∣(xAψ)}
5 df-rab 1208 . 2 {xAχ} = {x∣(xAχ)}
63, 4, 53eqtr4g 1147 1 (φ → {xAψ} = {xAχ})
This theorem is referenced by:  birabsdv 1344  onsucmin 2323
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∧ wa 196  {cab 1090   = wceq DSPAN CLASS=r STYLE="color:#D8A800">1091   ∈ wcel 1092  {crab 1204
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-rab 1208
metamath.org