HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem birabi 1342
Description: Equivalent wff's yield equal restricted class abstractions (inference rule).
Hypothesis
Ref Expression
birabi.1 (xA → (ψχ))
Assertion
Ref Expression
birabi {xAψ} = {xAχ}

Proof of Theorem birabi
StepHypRef Expression
1 birabi.1 . . . 4 (xA → (ψχ))
21pm5.32i 489 . . 3 ((xAψ) ↔ (xAχ))
32biabi 1181 . 2 {x∣(xAψ)} = {x∣(xAχ)}
4 df-rab 1208 . 2 {xAψ} = {x∣(xAψ)}
5 df-rab 1208 . 2 {xAχ} = {x∣(xAχ)}
63, 4, 53eqtr4 1126 1 {xAψ} = {xAχ}
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∧ wa 196  {cab 1090   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092  {crab 1204
This theorem is referenced by:  bm2.5ii 2274  nlimon 2369  rankval2 3514  ranksn 3532  kmlem3 3582  hta 3619  alephsuc3 4955
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-rab 1208
metamath.org