| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Formula-building rule for restricted universal quantifier (deduction rule). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| biraldva.1 | ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| biraldva | ⊢ (φ → (∀x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∀x ∈ A χ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 925 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) | |
| 2 | biraldva.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | biralda 1213 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (∀x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∀x ∈ A χ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∈ wcel 1092 ∀wral 1201 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ordunisssuc 2334 tfindsg2 2403 weinxp 2467 f1oweOLD 2944 isfinite2 3437 kmlem2 3581 iscard 3659 sup3 4511 indstr 4611 mdbr2 5728 dmdbr2 5733 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 ax-17 925 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ral 1205 |