| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| birald.1 | ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) |
| birald.2 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| birexd | ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | birald.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) | |
| 2 | birald.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 3 | 2 | adantr 306 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | birexda 1214 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∀wal 672 ∈ wcel 1092 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: birexdv 1220 birex 1224 tz9.13g 3508 scott0 3542 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-rex 1206 |