| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction rule). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| biraldva.1 | ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| birexdva | ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 925 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) | |
| 2 | biraldva.1 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ x ∈ A) → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | birexda 1214 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (∃x ∈ A ψ ↔ ∃x ∈ A χ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∈ wcel 1092 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: bi2rexa 1230 bi2rexdva 1234 weinxp 2467 fconstfv 2903 isomin 2937 f1oiso 2942 oaass 3163 r1pwcl 3530 sup3 4511 nnreclt 4522 projlem1 5193 projlem2 5194 projlem26 5218 chrelat 5757 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 ax-17 925 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-rex 1206 |