| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A syllogism rule of inference. The second premise is used to replace the consequent of the first premise. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bisyl8.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) |
| bisyl8.2 | ⊢ (θ ↔ τ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| bisyl8 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → τ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | bisyl8.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → θ))) | |
| 2 | bisyl8.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (θ ↔ τ) | |
| 3 | 2 | biimp 133 | . 2 ⊢ (θ → τ) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | syl8 25 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (χ → τ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 |