HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem carddom 3642
Description: Two sets have the dominance relationship iff their cardinalities have the subset relationship. Equation (i) of [Quine] p. 232.
Assertion
Ref Expression
carddom ((ACBD) → ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) ↔ AB))

Proof of Theorem carddom
StepHypRef Expression
1 carddomi 3641 . . 3 (AC → ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) → AB))
21adantr 306 . 2 ((ACBD) → ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) → AB))
3 carddomi 3641 . . . . . . . . 9 (BD → ((card ‘B) ⊆ (card ‘A) → BA))
4 cardon 3634 . . . . . . . . . 10 (card ‘A) ∈ On
54onelss 2348 . . . . . . . . 9 ((card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A) → (card ‘B) ⊆ (card ‘A))
63, 5syl5 22 . . . . . . . 8 (BD → ((card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A) → BA))
7 domnsym 3365 . . . . . . . 8 (BA → ¬ AB)
86, 7syl6 23 . . . . . . 7 (BD → ((card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A) → ¬ AB))
98con2d 83 . . . . . 6 (BD → (AB → ¬ (card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A)))
10 cardon 3634 . . . . . . 7 (card ‘B) ∈ On
11 ontri1 2232 . . . . . . 7 (((card ‘A) ∈ On ∧ (card ‘B) ∈ On) → ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) ↔ ¬ (card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A)))
124, 10, 11mp2an 520 . . . . . 6 ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) ↔ ¬ (card ‘B) ∈ (card ‘A))
139, 12syl6ibr 186 . . . . 5 (BD → (AB → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B)))
1413adantl 305 . . . 4 ((ACBD) → (AB → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B)))
15 carden 3638 . . . . 5 ((ACBD) → ((card ‘A) = (card ‘B) ↔ AB))
16 eqimss 1548 . . . . 5 ((card ‘A) = (card ‘B) → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B))
1715, 16syl6bir 188 . . . 4 ((ACBD) → (AB → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B)))
1814, 17jaod 329 . . 3 ((ACBD) → ((ABAB) → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B)))
19 brdom2 3292 . . 3 (AB ↔ (ABAB))
2018, 19syl5ib 181 . 2 ((ACBD) → (AB → (card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B)))
212, 20impbid 397 1 ((ACBD) → ((card ‘A) ⊆ (card ‘B) ↔ AB))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 1   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∨ wo 195   ∧ wa 196   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092   ⊆ wss 1487   class class class wbr 2054  Oncon0 2199   ‘cfv 2422   ≈ cen 3271   ≼ cdom 3272   ≺ csdm 3273  cardccrd 3620
This theorem is referenced by:  cardsdom 3643  domtri 3644  carduni 3664  cardprc 3667  cardaleph 3690
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-un 1076  ax-pow 1077  ax-reg 1078  ax-ac 1080
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-3or 582  df-3an 583  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-eu 1009  df-mo 1010  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-ral 1205  df-rex 1206  df-reu 1207  df-rab 1208  df-v 1349  df-sbc 1441  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-tp 1814  df-op 1815  df-uni 1920  df-int 1966  df-tr 2042  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-eprel 2122  df-id 2125  df-po 2128  df-so 2138  df-fr 2169  df-we 2186  df-ord 2202  df-on 2203  df-suc 2205  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-co 2427  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-ima 2431  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-f 2434  df-f1 2435  df-fo 2436  df-f1o 2437  df-fv 2438  df-er 3200  df-en 3274  df-dom 3275  df-sdom 3276  df-card 3623
metamath.org