| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Rule used to change the third bound variable in an operation abstraction, using implicit substitution. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cbvoprab3v.1 | ⊢ (z = w → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cbvoprab3v | ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} = {〈〈x, y〉, w〉∣ψ} |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | cbvoprab3v.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (z = w → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | anbi2d 468 | . . . 4 ⊢ (z = w → ((v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ) ↔ (v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ ψ))) |
| 3 | 2 | bi2exdv 938 | . . 3 ⊢ (z = w → (∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ) ↔ ∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ ψ))) |
| 4 | 3 | cbvopab2v 2109 | . 2 ⊢ {〈v, z〉∣∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)} = {〈v, w〉∣∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ ψ)} |
| 5 | dfoprab2 3021 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} = {〈v, z〉∣∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)} | |
| 6 | dfoprab2 3021 | . 2 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, w〉∣ψ} = {〈v, w〉∣∃x∃y(v = 〈x, y〉 ∧ ψ)} | |
| 7 | 4, 5, 6 | 3eqtr4 1126 | 1 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} = {〈〈x, y〉, w〉∣ψ} |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∃wex 678 = weq 797 = wceq 1091 〈cop 1810 {copab 2055 {copab2 3002 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ruclem12 4896 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-13 804 ax-14 805 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 ax-rep 1075 ax-pow 1077 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-v 1349 df-dif 1489 df-un 1490 df-in 1491 df-ss 1492 df-nul 1708 df-pw 1799 df-sn 1811 df-pr 1812 df-op 1815 df-opab 2098 df-oprab 3004 |