| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Rule used to change bound variables with implicit substitution. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cbvral.1 | ⊢ (φ → ∀yφ) |
| cbvral.2 | ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) |
| cbvral.3 | ⊢ (x = y → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| cbvrex | ⊢ (∃x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃y ∈ A ψ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 925 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x ∈ A → ∀y x ∈ A) | |
| 2 | cbvral.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (φ → ∀yφ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | hban 704 | . . 3 ⊢ ((x ∈ A ∧ φ) → ∀y(x ∈ A ∧ φ)) |
| 4 | ax-17 925 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ A → ∀x y ∈ A) | |
| 5 | cbvral.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (ψ → ∀xψ) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | hban 704 | . . 3 ⊢ ((y ∈ A ∧ ψ) → ∀x(y ∈ A ∧ ψ)) |
| 7 | eleq1 1149 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = y → (x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A)) | |
| 8 | cbvral.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = y → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | anbi12d 476 | . . 3 ⊢ (x = y → ((x ∈ A ∧ φ) ↔ (y ∈ A ∧ ψ))) |
| 10 | 3, 6, 9 | cbvex 849 | . 2 ⊢ (∃x(x ∈ A ∧ φ) ↔ ∃y(y ∈ A ∧ ψ)) |
| 11 | df-rex 1206 | . 2 ⊢ (∃x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃x(x ∈ A ∧ φ)) | |
| 12 | df-rex 1206 | . 2 ⊢ (∃y ∈ A ψ ↔ ∃y(y ∈ A ∧ ψ)) | |
| 13 | 10, 11, 12 | 3bitr4 158 | 1 ⊢ (∃x ∈ A φ ↔ ∃y ∈ A ψ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 = weq 797 ∈ wcel 1092 ∃wrex 1202 |
| This theorem is referenced by: cbvrexv 1334 elrnopab 2884 abrexexlem2 2911 elrnoprab 3054 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-12 802 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-rex 1206 |