| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A contraposition deduction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con1d.1 | ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con1d | ⊢ (φ → (¬ χ → ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con1d.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → χ)) | |
| 2 | con1 84 | . 2 ⊢ ((¬ ψ → χ) → (¬ χ → ψ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | syl 12 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (¬ χ → ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 |
| This theorem is referenced by: mt3i 100 mt3d 101 impt 122 dedlem0b 568 19.9t 719 sspss 1569 neldif 1594 sotrieq 2149 onmindif2 2313 limsssuc 2362 tfinds 2401 fvclss 2907 pw2en 3348 pssnn 3428 rankr1lem 3517 aceq5lem4 3561 entri 3645 nnleltp1t 4448 uzwo 4605 nnwoOLD 4608 om2uzf1o 4656 sqr0 4730 h1datom 5483 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |