| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A contraposition deduction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2d.1 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → ¬ χ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| con2d | ⊢ (φ → (χ → ¬ ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | con2d.1 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → ¬ χ)) | |
| 2 | con2 82 | . 2 ⊢ ((ψ → ¬ χ) → (χ → ¬ ψ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | syl 12 | 1 ⊢ (φ → (χ → ¬ ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 |
| This theorem is referenced by: con3 86 mt2i 97 mt2d 98 pm3.2im 107 pm2.65 115 cla4egf 1395 minel 1743 sotric 2148 supmo 2156 supnub 2162 tz7.2 2183 nordeq 2218 onnminsb 2271 oneqmin 2273 onminex 2275 limsssuc 2362 funun 2700 imadif 2714 tfrlem10 2958 tz7.48lem 2993 pssinf 3422 unblem1 3431 eirrv 3449 inf3lem6 3469 aceq5 3563 cardne 3637 carddom 3642 ondomcard 3663 cardmin 3666 alephnbtwn 3674 addnidpi 3822 genpnnp 3902 lt0nnn0 4549 nn0ge0t 4550 normgt0t 5078 stadd 5687 stadd3 5689 cvnsymt 5722 cvntrt 5724 atcvat 5771 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |