| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: The weak deduction theorem. For more information, see the Deduction Theorem link on the Metamath Proof Explorer home page. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedt.1 | ⊢ ((φ ↔ ((φ ∧ χ) ∨ (ψ ∧ ¬ χ))) → (θ ↔ τ)) |
| dedt.2 | ⊢ τ |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedt | ⊢ (χ → θ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dedlema 569 | . 2 ⊢ (χ → (φ ↔ ((φ ∧ χ) ∨ (ψ ∧ ¬ χ)))) | |
| 2 | dedt.2 | . . 3 ⊢ τ | |
| 3 | dedt.1 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ ↔ ((φ ∧ χ) ∨ (ψ ∧ ¬ χ))) → (θ ↔ τ)) | |
| 4 | 2, 3 | mpbiri 169 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ↔ ((φ ∧ χ) ∨ (ψ ∧ ¬ χ))) → θ) |
| 5 | 1, 4 | syl 12 | 1 ⊢ (χ → θ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∨ wo 195 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: con3th 573 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 |