| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Weak deduction theorem for eliminating hypotheses with 2 class variables. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth2v.1 | ⊢ (A = if(φ, A, C) → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| dedth2v.2 | ⊢ (B = if(φ, B, D) → (χ ↔ θ)) |
| dedth2v.3 | ⊢ θ |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dedth2v | ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dedth2v.3 | . 2 ⊢ θ | |
| 2 | iftrue 1780 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → if(φ, A, C) = A) | |
| 3 | 2 | cleqcomd 1106 | . . . 4 ⊢ (φ → A = if(φ, A, C)) |
| 4 | dedth2v.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (A = if(φ, A, C) → (ψ ↔ χ)) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | syl 12 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ χ)) |
| 6 | iftrue 1780 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → if(φ, B, D) = B) | |
| 7 | 6 | cleqcomd 1106 | . . . 4 ⊢ (φ → B = if(φ, B, D)) |
| 8 | dedth2v.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (B = if(φ, B, D) → (χ ↔ θ)) | |
| 9 | 7, 8 | syl 12 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (χ ↔ θ)) |
| 10 | 5, 9 | bitrd 406 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ θ)) |
| 11 | 1, 10 | mpbiri 169 | 1 ⊢ (φ → ψ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 = wceq 1091 ifcif 1776 |
| This theorem is referenced by: climuni 4884 hlimuni 5144 omls 5251 osumlem8 5537 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-if 1777 |