| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Equivalence for subclass relation requiring only that x not be free in A and B (but not necessarily absent from them). |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dfss2f.1 | ⊢ (y ∈ A → ∀x y ∈ A) |
| dfss2f.2 | ⊢ (y ∈ B → ∀x y ∈ B) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| dfss2f | ⊢ (A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dfss2 1497 | . 2 ⊢ (A ⊆ B ↔ ∀y(y ∈ A → y ∈ B)) | |
| 2 | ax-17 925 | . . 3 ⊢ ((x ∈ A → x ∈ B) → ∀y(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)) | |
| 3 | dfss2f.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ A → ∀x y ∈ A) | |
| 4 | dfss2f.2 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ B → ∀x y ∈ B) | |
| 5 | 3, 4 | hbim 702 | . . 3 ⊢ ((y ∈ A → y ∈ B) → ∀x(y ∈ A → y ∈ B)) |
| 6 | eleq1 1149 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = y → (x ∈ A ↔ y ∈ A)) | |
| 7 | eleq1 1149 | . . . 4 ⊢ (x = y → (x ∈ B ↔ y ∈ B)) | |
| 8 | 6, 7 | imbi12d 474 | . . 3 ⊢ (x = y → ((x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ↔ (y ∈ A → y ∈ B))) |
| 9 | 2, 5, 8 | cbval 848 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B) ↔ ∀y(y ∈ A → y ∈ B)) |
| 10 | 1, 9 | bitr4 154 | 1 ⊢ (A ⊆ B ↔ ∀x(x ∈ A → x ∈ B)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∀wal 672 = weq 797 ∈ wcel 1092 ⊆ wss 1487 |
| This theorem is referenced by: dfss3f 1500 hbss 1501 ss2ab 1551 fopab2 2891 iunon 2947 iinon 2948 ranklon 3540 scott0 3542 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-in 1491 df-ss 1492 |