| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Membership in omega. The antecedent can be eliminated if we assume the Axiom of Infinity; see elom3 3478. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| elomg | ⊢ (A ∈ B → (A ∈ ω ↔ (Ord A ∧ ∀x(Lim x → A ∈ x)))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eleq1 1149 | . 2 ⊢ (y = A → (y ∈ ω ↔ A ∈ ω)) | |
| 2 | ordeq 2206 | . . 3 ⊢ (y = A → (Ord y ↔ Ord A)) | |
| 3 | eleq1 1149 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (y = A → (y ∈ x ↔ A ∈ x)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 464 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y = A → ((Lim x → y ∈ x) ↔ (Lim x → A ∈ x))) |
| 5 | 4 | bialdv 935 | . . 3 ⊢ (y = A → (∀x(Lim x → y ∈ x) ↔ ∀x(Lim x → A ∈ x))) |
| 6 | 2, 5 | anbi12d 476 | . 2 ⊢ (y = A → ((Ord y ∧ ∀x(Lim x → y ∈ x)) ↔ (Ord A ∧ ∀x(Lim x → A ∈ x)))) |
| 7 | visset 1350 | . . 3 ⊢ y ∈ V | |
| 8 | 7 | elom 2375 | . 2 ⊢ (y ∈ ω ↔ (Ord y ∧ ∀x(Lim x → y ∈ x))) |
| 9 | 1, 6, 8 | vtoclbg 1384 | 1 ⊢ (A ∈ B → (A ∈ ω ↔ (Ord A ∧ ∀x(Lim x → A ∈ x)))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∈ wel 803 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 Ord word 2198 Lim wlim 2200 ωcom 2372 |
| This theorem is referenced by: nnlim 2385 limom 2387 elom3 3478 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-3an 583 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-ral 1205 df-rex 1206 df-v 1349 df-dif 1489 df-un 1490 df-in 1491 df-ss 1492 df-nul 1708 df-sn 1811 df-pr 1812 df-op 1815 df-uni 1920 df-tr 2042 df-br 2063 df-po 2128 df-so 2138 df-fr 2169 df-we 2186 df-ord 2202 df-om 2373 |