| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: A commutation rule for distinct variable specifiers. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eq4ds.1 | ⊢ (¬ ∀x x = y → φ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| eq4ds | ⊢ (¬ ∀y y = x → φ) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | eq4 821 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀x x = y → ∀y y = x) | |
| 2 | eq4ds.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ ∀x x = y → φ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | nsyl4 105 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ φ → ∀y y = x) |
| 4 | 3 | con1i 88 | 1 ⊢ (¬ ∀y y = x → φ) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ∀wal 672 = weq 797 |
| This theorem is referenced by: sbcom 916 ralcom2 1314 nd5 3736 axrepndlem1 3738 axrepndlem2 3739 axrepnd 3740 axpowndlem3 3745 axpownd 3747 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-12 802 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 |