| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Introduce a conjunct in the scope of an existential quantifier. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exintr | ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (∃xφ → ∃x(φ ∧ ψ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hba1 698 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → ∀x∀x(φ → ψ)) | |
| 2 | ancl 242 | . . 3 ⊢ ((φ → ψ) → (φ → (φ ∧ ψ))) | |
| 3 | 2 | a4s 682 | . 2 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (φ → (φ ∧ ψ))) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | 19.22d 744 | 1 ⊢ (∀x(φ → ψ) → (∃xφ → ∃x(φ ∧ ψ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ceqsex 1370 r19.2z 1766 pwpw0 1883 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-gen 677 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 |