HomeHome Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Related theorems
GIF version

Theorem fcnvres 2768
Description: The converse of a restriction of a function.
Assertion
Ref Expression
fcnvres (F:A–→B(FA) = (FB))

Proof of Theorem fcnvres
StepHypRef Expression
1 visset 1350 . . . . . . . . 9 yV
21opelf 2762 . . . . . . . 8 ((F:A–→B ∧ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F) → (xAyB))
32pm3.26d 258 . . . . . . 7 ((F:A–→B ∧ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F) → xA)
43exp 291 . . . . . 6 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA))
5 pm4.71 481 . . . . . 6 ((⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA)))
64, 5sylib 173 . . . . 5 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA)))
7 visset 1350 . . . . . . 7 xV
81, 7opelcnv 2518 . . . . . 6 (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ (FA))
91opelres 2579 . . . . . 6 (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA))
108, 9bitr 151 . . . . 5 (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FxA))
116, 10syl6bbr 416 . . . 4 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA)))
122pm3.27d 262 . . . . . . 7 ((F:A–→B ∧ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F) → yB)
1312exp 291 . . . . . 6 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB))
14 pm4.71 481 . . . . . 6 ((⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB)))
1513, 14sylib 173 . . . . 5 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB)))
167opelres 2579 . . . . . 6 (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB) ↔ (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ FyB))
171, 7opelcnv 2518 . . . . . . 7 (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ F ↔ ⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F)
1817anbi1i 368 . . . . . 6 ((⟨y, x⟩ ∈ FyB) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB))
1916, 18bitr 151 . . . . 5 (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB) ↔ (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ FyB))
2015, 19syl6bbr 416 . . . 4 (F:A–→B → (⟨x, y⟩ ∈ F ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB)))
2111, 20bitr3d 408 . . 3 (F:A–→B → (⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB)))
222119.21aivv 944 . 2 (F:A–→B → ∀yx(⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB)))
23 relcnv 2624 . . 3 Rel (FA)
24 relres 2591 . . 3 Rel (FB)
25 cleqrel 2483 . . 3 ((Rel (FA) ∧ Rel (FB)) → ((FA) = (FB) ↔ ∀yx(⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB))))
2623, 24, 25mp2an 520 . 2 ((FA) = (FB) ↔ ∀yx(⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FA) ↔ ⟨y, x⟩ ∈ (FB)))
2722, 26sylibr 175 1 (F:A–→B(FA) = (FB))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   → wi 2   ↔ wb 127   ∧ wa 196  ∀wal 672   = wceq 1091   ∈ wcel 1092  ⟨cop 1810  ccnv 2409   ↾ cres 2412  Rel wrel 2415  –→wf 2418
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 3  ax-2 4  ax-3 5  ax-mp 6  ax-4 673  ax-5 674  ax-6 675  ax-7 676  ax-gen 677  ax-8 798  ax-9 799  ax-10 800  ax-11 801  ax-12 802  ax-13 804  ax-14 805  ax-16 922  ax-17 925  ax-ext 1074  ax-rep 1075  ax-pow 1077
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 128  df-or 197  df-an 198  df-ex 679  df-sb 853  df-clab 1093  df-cleq 1097  df-clel 1099  df-v 1349  df-dif 1489  df-un 1490  df-in 1491  df-ss 1492  df-nul 1708  df-pw 1799  df-sn 1811  df-pr 1812  df-op 1815  df-br 2063  df-opab 2098  df-xp 2424  df-rel 2425  df-cnv 2426  df-dm 2428  df-rn 2429  df-res 2430  df-fun 2432  df-fn 2433  df-f 2434
metamath.org