| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Change of bound variable using implicit substitution. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| gencbval.1 | ⊢ A ∈ V |
| gencbval.2 | ⊢ (A = y → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| gencbval.3 | ⊢ (A = y → (χ ↔ θ)) |
| gencbval.4 | ⊢ (θ ↔ ∃x(χ ∧ A = y)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| gencbval | ⊢ (∀x(χ → φ) ↔ ∀y(θ → ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | gencbval.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ A ∈ V | |
| 2 | gencbval.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (A = y → (φ ↔ ψ)) | |
| 3 | 2 | negbid 463 | . . . 4 ⊢ (A = y → (¬ φ ↔ ¬ ψ)) |
| 4 | gencbval.3 | . . . 4 ⊢ (A = y → (χ ↔ θ)) | |
| 5 | gencbval.4 | . . . 4 ⊢ (θ ↔ ∃x(χ ∧ A = y)) | |
| 6 | 1, 3, 4, 5 | gencbvex 1372 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x(χ ∧ ¬ φ) ↔ ∃y(θ ∧ ¬ ψ)) |
| 7 | exanali 725 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x(χ ∧ ¬ φ) ↔ ¬ ∀x(χ → φ)) | |
| 8 | exanali 725 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃y(θ ∧ ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ ∀y(θ → ψ)) | |
| 9 | 6, 7, 8 | 3bitr3 156 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀x(χ → φ) ↔ ¬ ∀y(θ → ψ)) |
| 10 | 9 | bicon4i 401 | 1 ⊢ (∀x(χ → φ) ↔ ∀y(θ → ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 Vcvv 1348 |
| This theorem is referenced by: suppsr 4016 supsrlem6 4024 supre 4054 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-9 799 ax-12 802 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-v 1349 |