| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for a function. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbfun.1 | ⊢ (y ∈ F → ∀x y ∈ F) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbfun | ⊢ (Fun F → ∀xFun F) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hbfun.1 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ F → ∀x y ∈ F) | |
| 2 | 1 | hbrel 2478 | . . 3 ⊢ (Rel F → ∀xRel F) |
| 3 | 1 | hbcnv 2516 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (y ∈ ◡F → ∀x y ∈ ◡F) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | hbco 2508 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ (F ∘ ◡F) → ∀x y ∈ (F ∘ ◡F)) |
| 5 | ax-17 925 | . . . 4 ⊢ (y ∈ I → ∀x y ∈ I) | |
| 6 | 4, 5 | hbss 1501 | . . 3 ⊢ ((F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I → ∀x(F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I) |
| 7 | 2, 6 | hban 704 | . 2 ⊢ ((Rel F ∧ (F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I) → ∀x(Rel F ∧ (F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I)) |
| 8 | df-fun 2432 | . 2 ⊢ (Fun F ↔ (Rel F ∧ (F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I)) | |
| 9 | 8 | bial 695 | . 2 ⊢ (∀xFun F ↔ ∀x(Rel F ∧ (F ∘ ◡F) ⊆ I)) |
| 10 | 7, 8, 9 | 3imtr4 192 | 1 ⊢ (Fun F → ∀xFun F) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∈ wcel 1092 ⊆ wss 1487 Icid 2057 ◡ccnv 2409 ∘ ccom 2414 Rel wrel 2415 Fun wfun 2416 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hbfn 2720 hbf1 2779 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-13 804 ax-14 805 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 ax-rep 1075 ax-pow 1077 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-v 1349 df-dif 1489 df-un 1490 df-in 1491 df-ss 1492 df-nul 1708 df-pw 1799 df-sn 1811 df-pr 1812 df-op 1815 df-br 2063 df-opab 2098 df-rel 2425 df-cnv 2426 df-co 2427 df-fun 2432 |