| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Deduction form of bound-variable hypothesis builder hbim 702. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbimd.1 | ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) |
| hbimd.2 | ⊢ (φ → (ψ → ∀xψ)) |
| hbimd.3 | ⊢ (φ → (χ → ∀xχ)) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbimd | ⊢ (φ → ((ψ → χ) → ∀x(ψ → χ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hbimd.1 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (φ → ∀xφ) | |
| 2 | hbimd.2 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → ∀xψ)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | hbnd 786 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → (¬ ψ → ∀x ¬ ψ)) |
| 4 | 3 | com12 13 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (φ → ∀x ¬ ψ)) |
| 5 | pm2.21 71 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 6 | 5 | 19.20i 691 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀x ¬ ψ → ∀x(ψ → χ)) |
| 7 | 4, 6 | syl6 23 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ ψ → (φ → ∀x(ψ → χ))) |
| 8 | hbimd.3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → (χ → ∀xχ)) | |
| 9 | 8 | com12 13 | . . . 4 ⊢ (χ → (φ → ∀xχ)) |
| 10 | ax-1 3 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (χ → (ψ → χ)) | |
| 11 | 10 | 19.20i 691 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∀xχ → ∀x(ψ → χ)) |
| 12 | 9, 11 | syl6 23 | . . 3 ⊢ (χ → (φ → ∀x(ψ → χ))) |
| 13 | 7, 12 | ja 118 | . 2 ⊢ ((ψ → χ) → (φ → ∀x(ψ → χ))) |
| 14 | 13 | com12 13 | 1 ⊢ (φ → ((ψ → χ) → ∀x(ψ → χ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ∀wal 672 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hbbid 789 19.21g 792 hbsb4 905 ddelimf2 907 ralcom2 1314 axrepndlem1 3738 axrepndlem2 3739 axunndlem1 3741 axunnd 3742 axpowndlem2 3744 axpowndlem3 3745 axpowndlem4 3746 axregndlem2 3749 axregnd 3750 axinfndlem1 3751 axinfnd 3752 axacndlem4 3756 axacndlem5 3757 axacnd 3758 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-gen 677 |