| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Bound-variable hypothesis builder for class abstraction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbopab.1 | ⊢ (φ → ∀zφ) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hbopab | ⊢ (w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ} → ∀z w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ax-17 925 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (w = 〈x, y〉 → ∀z w = 〈x, y〉) | |
| 2 | hbopab.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (φ → ∀zφ) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | hban 704 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ) → ∀z(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)) |
| 4 | 3 | hbex 701 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ) → ∀z∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)) |
| 5 | 4 | hbex 701 | . 2 ⊢ (∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ) → ∀z∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)) |
| 6 | elopab 2110 | . 2 ⊢ (w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ} ↔ ∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)) | |
| 7 | 6 | bial 695 | . 2 ⊢ (∀z w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ} ↔ ∀z∃x∃y(w = 〈x, y〉 ∧ φ)) |
| 8 | 5, 6, 7 | 3imtr4 192 | 1 ⊢ (w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ} → ∀z w ∈ {〈x, y〉∣φ}) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 〈cop 1810 {copab 2055 |
| This theorem is referenced by: hbco 2508 hbrdg 2974 mapxpen 3390 tz9.12lem3 3505 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-13 804 ax-14 805 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 ax-rep 1075 ax-pow 1077 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-or 197 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-v 1349 df-dif 1489 df-un 1490 df-in 1491 df-ss 1492 df-nul 1708 df-pw 1799 df-sn 1811 df-pr 1812 df-op 1815 df-opab 2098 |