| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: The abstraction variables in an operation abstraction are not free. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| hboprab2 | ⊢ (w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} → ∀y w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ}) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | hbe1 709 | . . . 4 ⊢ (∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ) → ∀y∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | hbex 701 | . . 3 ⊢ (∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ) → ∀y∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)) |
| 3 | 2 | hbab 1096 | . 2 ⊢ (w ∈ {v∣∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)} → ∀y w ∈ {v∣∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)}) |
| 4 | df-oprab 3004 | . . 3 ⊢ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} = {v∣∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)} | |
| 5 | 4 | eleq2i 1153 | . 2 ⊢ (w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} ↔ w ∈ {v∣∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)}) |
| 6 | 5 | bial 695 | . 2 ⊢ (∀y w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} ↔ ∀y w ∈ {v∣∃x∃y∃z(v = 〈〈x, y〉, z〉 ∧ φ)}) |
| 7 | 3, 5, 6 | 3imtr4 192 | 1 ⊢ (w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ} → ∀y w ∈ {〈〈x, y〉, z〉∣φ}) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ∧ wa 196 ∀wal 672 ∃wex 678 {cab 1090 = wceq 1091 ∈ wcel 1092 〈cop 1810 {copab2 3002 |
| This theorem is referenced by: elrnoprab 3054 mapxpen 3390 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 ax-4 673 ax-5 674 ax-6 675 ax-7 676 ax-gen 677 ax-8 798 ax-9 799 ax-10 800 ax-11 801 ax-12 802 ax-16 922 ax-17 925 ax-ext 1074 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 df-ex 679 df-sb 853 df-clab 1093 df-cleq 1097 df-clel 1099 df-oprab 3004 |