| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Implication in terms of implication and biconditional. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| ibib | ⊢ ((φ → ψ) ↔ (φ → (φ ↔ ψ))) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pm3.4 266 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → (φ → ψ)) | |
| 2 | pm3.26 256 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → φ) | |
| 3 | 2 | a1d 14 | . . . . 5 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → (ψ → φ)) |
| 4 | 1, 3 | impbid 397 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) → (φ ↔ ψ)) |
| 5 | 4 | exp 291 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → (ψ → (φ ↔ ψ))) |
| 6 | bi1 130 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((φ ↔ ψ) → (φ → ψ)) | |
| 7 | 6 | com12 13 | . . 3 ⊢ (φ → ((φ ↔ ψ) → ψ)) |
| 8 | 5, 7 | impbid 397 | . 2 ⊢ (φ → (ψ ↔ (φ ↔ ψ))) |
| 9 | 8 | pm5.74i 443 | 1 ⊢ ((φ → ψ) ↔ (φ → (φ ↔ ψ))) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: ibd 451 oibabs 493 pm5.1 501 reuuni4 1959 brinxp 2466 zneo 4601 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3 ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |