| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Related theorems GIF version |
| Description: Express implication in terms of conjunction. |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| imnan | ⊢ ((φ → ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-an 198 | . 2 ⊢ ((φ ∧ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ → ¬ ψ)) | |
| 2 | 1 | bicon2i 194 | 1 ⊢ ((φ → ¬ ψ) ↔ ¬ (φ ∧ ψ)) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 1 → wi 2 ↔ wb 127 ∧ wa 196 |
| This theorem is referenced by: anass 336 pm5.18 497 dfbi 499 nan 514 ecase2d 558 alinexa 724 eueq3 1430 ssnpss 1573 difin 1670 disj 1733 minel 1743 inssdif0 1754 sotric 2148 dfwe2 2187 ordtri1 2231 ordsucss 2320 onuninsuc 2356 funun 2700 imadif 2714 oalimcl 3162 0nelqs 3234 unblem1 3431 kmlem7 3586 kmlem12 3591 alephnbtwn 3674 aleph1 3676 alephsucdom 3685 cfsuc 3709 genpnnp 3902 nnunb 4520 nneo 4719 sqr2irrlem3 4779 cvnsymt 5722 hatomistic 5755 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 3¹/SPAN> ax-2 4 ax-3 5 ax-mp 6 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 128 df-an 198 |